| Author |
Message |
Yvan
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:25 am Post subject:
Audi 100 '89 ISV Part No confusion |
|
|
I was looking at eBay for ISV for my 5-cyl '89 Audi 100. There are few,
but the ones that look like the one I have in my car have BOSCH part no
0 280 140 512 and 0 280 140 516. They look exactly the same (on eBay
photo).
I looked at one in my Audi, but part No is not visible any more.
Anyone knows what is the difference between these two BOSCH parts? Can I
get 512 or 516?
Not convinced that sellers on eBay can provide exact information, and I
would not want to buy wrong ISV.
--
___ ____
/__/ / \ ** Registrovani korisnik Linuksa #291606 **
/ / \/ /\ \ ** Registered Linux user #291606 **
/__/\____/--\__\ ** http://counter.li.org/ **
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grizzly
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:50 am Post subject:
Re: Audi 100 '89 ISV Part No confusion |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:25:48 +0100, Yvan <me@privacy.net> wrote:
| Quote: | I was looking at eBay for ISV for my 5-cyl '89 Audi 100. There are few,
but the ones that look like the one I have in my car have BOSCH part no
0 280 140 512 and 0 280 140 516. They look exactly the same (on eBay
photo).
I looked at one in my Audi, but part No is not visible any more.
Anyone knows what is the difference between these two BOSCH parts? Can I
get 512 or 516?
Not convinced that sellers on eBay can provide exact information, and I
would not want to buy wrong ISV.
|
As far as I know, some have two electrical connectors and some have
three. That's probably the only thing you need to worry about.
Both part numbers show up in a Google search. You may want to plough
through the links. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yvan
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:50 am Post subject:
Re: Audi 100 '89 ISV Part No confusion |
|
|
Nedavno Grizzly pise:
| On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:25:48 +0100, Yvan <me@privacy.net> wrote:
|
| >I was looking at eBay for ISV for my 5-cyl '89 Audi 100. There are
| >few, but the ones that look like the one I have in my car have BOSCH
| >part no 0 280 140 512 and 0 280 140 516. They look exactly the same
| >(on eBay photo).
| >
| >I looked at one in my Audi, but part No is not visible any more.
| >Anyone knows what is the difference between these two BOSCH parts?
| >Can I get 512 or 516?
| As far as I know, some have two electrical connectors and some have
| three. That's probably the only thing you need to worry about.
Both 512 and 516 have two pin electrical connectors. And on photo both
look exactly the same. I was thinking if there is some difference
mechanically or electronically.
| Both part numbers show up in a Google search. You may want to plough
| through the links.
I did, but I could find no difference.
--
___ ____
/__/ / \ ** Registrovani korisnik Linuksa #291606 **
/ / \/ /\ \ ** Registered Linux user #291606 **
/__/\____/--\__\ ** http://counter.li.org/ **
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grizzly
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 02, 2005 7:49 am Post subject:
Re: Audi 100 '89 ISV Part No confusion |
|
|
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 07:13:45 +0100, Yvan <me@privacy.net> wrote:
| Quote: | Nedavno Grizzly pise:
| On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:25:48 +0100, Yvan <me@privacy.net> wrote:
|
| >I was looking at eBay for ISV for my 5-cyl '89 Audi 100. There are
| >few, but the ones that look like the one I have in my car have BOSCH
| >part no 0 280 140 512 and 0 280 140 516. They look exactly the same
| >(on eBay photo).
|
| >I looked at one in my Audi, but part No is not visible any more.
| >Anyone knows what is the difference between these two BOSCH parts?
| >Can I get 512 or 516?
| As far as I know, some have two electrical connectors and some have
| three. That's probably the only thing you need to worry about.
Both 512 and 516 have two pin electrical connectors. And on photo both
look exactly the same. I was thinking if there is some difference
mechanically or electronically.
| Both part numbers show up in a Google search. You may want to plough
| through the links.
I did, but I could find no difference.
|
As long as it has two electrical connectors, it should be fine -
they're not exactly rocket science. I've got a few of them myself -
I'll have a look at the part numbers for you.
BTW have you tried cleaning out the one you've got? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yvan
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:40 pm Post subject:
Re: Audi 100 '89 ISV Part No confusion |
|
|
Nedavno Grizzly pise:
| As long as it has two electrical connectors, it should be fine -
| they're not exactly rocket science. I've got a few of them myself -
| I'll have a look at the part numbers for you.
| BTW have you tried cleaning out the one you've got?
Yes I did. Actually I am not sure that ISV is my problem. It's a long
story. I have dual fuel petrol - LPG powered Audi 100 and idle problem
(stalling) both when on petrol and LPG, only when on LPG it is more
noticeable.
I checked hoses for any vacuum leak, and couldn't find any. So I solved
my problem (kind of) by cutting a wire from ISV to fuel injection
control unit (under right side kick panel), and connecting it to rear
fog light switch. Now I can start with ISV on, and for a few minutes
engine runs on higher rpm idle. When engine gets warmer, I hit the
switch, disconnect ISV, and engine will not stall.
Interesting thing is that engine when warmer that 50 deg Celsius runs
fine without ISV connected. Am I right then to assume that I have no
vacuum leaks?
There are some used ISV-s on eBay that are not expensive, so I was
thinking of buying one and see if ISV is my problem.
--
___ ____
/__/ / \ ** Registrovani korisnik Linuksa #291606 **
/ / \/ /\ \ ** Registered Linux user #291606 **
/__/\____/--\__\ ** http://counter.li.org/ ** |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grizzly
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:50 am Post subject:
Re: Audi 100 '89 ISV Part No confusion |
|
|
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:40:56 +0100, Yvan <me@privacy.net> wrote:
| Quote: | Nedavno Grizzly pise:
| As long as it has two electrical connectors, it should be fine -
| they're not exactly rocket science. I've got a few of them myself -
| I'll have a look at the part numbers for you.
| BTW have you tried cleaning out the one you've got?
Yes I did. Actually I am not sure that ISV is my problem. It's a long
story. I have dual fuel petrol - LPG powered Audi 100 and idle problem
(stalling) both when on petrol and LPG, only when on LPG it is more
noticeable.
I checked hoses for any vacuum leak, and couldn't find any. So I solved
my problem (kind of) by cutting a wire from ISV to fuel injection
control unit (under right side kick panel), and connecting it to rear
fog light switch. Now I can start with ISV on, and for a few minutes
engine runs on higher rpm idle. When engine gets warmer, I hit the
switch, disconnect ISV, and engine will not stall.
Interesting thing is that engine when warmer that 50 deg Celsius runs
fine without ISV connected. Am I right then to assume that I have no
vacuum leaks?
|
I couldn't really say for sure. One thing I have noticed with these
5-cylinder engines (particularly the earlier ones, i.e. up to 1988 or
so) is that a poor connection at the temperature sensors (near the
thermostat) will give the same kind of stalling problems that you
mention.
| Quote: | There are some used ISV-s on eBay that are not expensive, so I was
thinking of buying one and see if ISV is my problem.
|
A used ISV may be no better than what you already have. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grizzly
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Mar 05, 2005 12:33 am Post subject:
Re: Audi 100 '89 ISV Part No confusion |
|
|
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 07:15:22 +0000, Grizzly <grizzlybear@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
| Quote: | On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 07:13:45 +0100, Yvan <me@privacy.net> wrote:
Nedavno Grizzly pise:
| On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:25:48 +0100, Yvan <me@privacy.net> wrote:
|
| >I was looking at eBay for ISV for my 5-cyl '89 Audi 100. There are
| >few, but the ones that look like the one I have in my car have BOSCH
| >part no 0 280 140 512 and 0 280 140 516. They look exactly the same
| >(on eBay photo).
|
| >I looked at one in my Audi, but part No is not visible any more.
| >Anyone knows what is the difference between these two BOSCH parts?
| >Can I get 512 or 516?
| As far as I know, some have two electrical connectors and some have
| three. That's probably the only thing you need to worry about.
Both 512 and 516 have two pin electrical connectors. And on photo both
look exactly the same. I was thinking if there is some difference
mechanically or electronically.
| Both part numbers show up in a Google search. You may want to plough
| through the links.
I did, but I could find no difference.
As long as it has two electrical connectors, it should be fine -
they're not exactly rocket science. I've got a few of them myself -
I'll have a look at the part numbers for you.
|
Having said that, I couldn't read the numbers on either of mine
either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yvan
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:36 am Post subject:
Re: Audi 100 '89 ISV Part No confusion |
|
|
Nedavno Grizzly pise:
| >As long as it has two electrical connectors, it should be fine -
| >they're not exactly rocket science. I've got a few of them myself -
| >I'll have a look at the part numbers for you.
|
| Having said that, I couldn't read the numbers on either of mine
| either.
I looked a little closer at my ISV, and it looks like last three digits
are 512. So you think I should do fine with 516 (two pin electrical
connector as 512 is). Will keep looking at eBay... Maybe something will
pop-up.
--
___ ____
/__/ / \ ** Registrovani korisnik Linuksa #291606 **
/ / \/ /\ \ ** Registered Linux user #291606 **
/__/\____/--\__\ ** http://counter.li.org/ ** |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|