What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate?
Auto-Forums.net Forum Index Auto-Forums.net
Discussion of automobiles and popular brands
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web auto-forums.net
What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Auto-Forums.net Forum Index -> Toyota
Author Message
redc1c4
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 9:19 am    Post subject: Re: Pop Quiz: What's wrong with Bob? Reply with quote

smallfoot wrote:
Quote:

In article <dn67i0$37o$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>, Robert Peffers decided
to try to bore everyone in the universe with this crap:

"Darrell" <spam@this.eh> wrote in message
news:Cu6dnaXCnf0x1AveRVn-pg@rogers.com...
Dick Scoville just plunges his head up his ass and starts to shout.





Why didn't Robert add any new text before posting his response?

a) He doesn't know how to use Outlook Express.

b) He's fucking stupid.

c) He thinks that by clipping soc.culture.scottish and then posting a
nothing response, the thread will magically disappear from that specific
group.

d) He forgot.

Answer

(Feel free to specify more than one selection.)

e) he's a booger eating moron.

f) all of the above.

redc1c4,
amused by it all..... %-)
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide

Back to top
smallfoot
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 9:19 am    Post subject: Re: Please keep scs in the headers Reply with quote

In article <dn78rr$slg$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, Robert Peffers decided
to try to bore everyone in the universe with this crap:
Quote:

"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:061220052113543598%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
Peter J Ross <pjr@kookbusters.org> wrote:

On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:24:31 +1300, Adam Whyte-Settlar
grawillers@hotmail.com> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:

[nothing]

Are you an ordinary spammer or a Clan Warlord spammer?

Another crop of blank-posting kooks? Who put too much Miracle-Gro on
the bedding this time?

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy

"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."

"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."

-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004

"I am a sean being from another planet."
-- Darla aka Dr. Why aka Dr. Yubiwan aka Silouen aka ...



Oh, look, another blank response from Bob. Do parts of the UK have
something odd in the drinking water, or is there just something odd
about Bob?
Back to top
smallfoot
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 9:19 am    Post subject: Pop Quiz: What's wrong with Bob? Reply with quote

In article <dn67i0$37o$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>, Robert Peffers decided
to try to bore everyone in the universe with this crap:
Quote:

"Darrell" <spam@this.eh> wrote in message
news:Cu6dnaXCnf0x1AveRVn-pg@rogers.com...
Dick Scoville just plunges his head up his ass and starts to shout.





Why didn't Robert add any new text before posting his response?

a) He doesn't know how to use Outlook Express.

b) He's fucking stupid.

c) He thinks that by clipping soc.culture.scottish and then posting a
nothing response, the thread will magically disappear from that specific
group.

d) He forgot.

Answer>

(Feel free to specify more than one selection.)

Back to top
Aratzio
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 9:19 am    Post subject: Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate Reply with quote

On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:17:44 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:

Quote:
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:57:14 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

Why should I weant to respond to a bunch of groups I don't suscribe to?

Like you can help yourself. You hide behind killfiles and respond
*vicariously* (hee hee that one killed me). But no, you snecked the
froups and declared *victolly* hoping no one from AUK had subbed
toyota.tard.land. Not quite the same, now is it, sparkles?

So what?
^^^^^^^^^^^

WHoa, incisive! I mean not like you've not used that everytime you
were stumped by facts.

HAHAHAHA! WHAT facts? And it takes a lot more that you to 'stump' me.

So the whole "So what?" after responding to YOUR question means what,
bunky? I mean, you asked a question, I hammer the answer home and then
you respond with "So What". Which means you were left with no place to
go and had to pretend you had not really asked the question.

Quote:




That one makes no sense at all. You wanna play in the Toyota group, play
there. I don't really need your 'audience' to serve up what a fool you are.

But you needed an audience to declare your *victolly* and hoped no one
really saw you were running and hiding. Not quite the same, now is it,
pumpkin?

I don't need nothing. You need to feed your ego by putting all the groups
back in. Personally, I really don't care one way or the other.

*snicker*
Which is why you post your *victolly* dances and screed bombs about
*the old days* blah blah blah.

You mean, when Trolls had Brains?

Like you have even a niggling sense of what is either of those nouns.

Quote:




And you're wrong. I declared *victolly* in about 15 minutes. It's really
not all that hard to best you...you just keep on with the ssame old crap
over and over, just like you are now. Nothing new here...

Wow, there be the PKB of the *weak*. Another of your oh so standarized
responses. Has any of your lamery worked, ever?


LOL! *YOU* talking about 'standardized responses'?! That's a GOOD one!

RUH ROH SCOOBY. Did you happen to work your way to the end, queeny?

Nah...just the same old crap allover again, I'm sure.

Yeah, just more predictions about your responses. Spot on, again.
Quote:


I peeked, nope you did not. HEE HEE HEE. <preens


Getting the lice out of your feathers?

Wow, a toyota.tard (f)lame. Quite devastating. Bit of a stretch don't
ya think though, a bird, snicker. You would have look less lame with a
gay or drug lame.

Quote:




I wasn't reading your posts, I was reading other's responses to you weak
arguements. Little bit of a difference there, Sunshine.

As I said, you were "responding by proxy", reading impaired on top of
being a liar. Probably have not a clue what that statement meant.

So?

Okay since you just admitted you have no clue what "responding by
proxy" means would you like it in words of less than two *sylabels*

Who said I have no clue? "so" means, "Who gives a Fuck?"

"Probably have not a clue what that statement meant."
"so?"/"Who gives a fuck?"

You still says you admit that you have not a clue.
"So, who gives a fuck I do not have a clue"

You do understand how English works and all, right? Oh, wait, no, you
just wrote you did not have a clue.

Quote:





"You plonked me!!! You plonked me!!" Yeah, so what?

Hee Hee, public plonkings and hoping against hope everyone will just
stop smacking you around. Yeah, how's that workin out for ya?

Who's smacking me around? I don't see anyone smacking me around.

That would be due to brain damage from the constant bitch slappings.


Takes someone with a LOT more talent than you exhibit...

When I can make you do it to yourself, see above, then why would I
actually work at it?

Quote:


So how did that whole "I'm hiding behing my killfile work out"?

The difference being?

Umm, snuffles, point out the differential of the question I asked?
Difference to what, sparky?

The difference between your brain damage and hiding behind killfiles
is the best I could even find and I wrote the damn statement and
questions.
Quote:






And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would.
I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake".
Nothing new, just the same old crap.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE
RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU!

Yup...exactly. Even though you've been told you were plonked you kept
responding and kept responding. And still you just keep on coming back.
Maybe the way you entered it above is the way it played in your little
mind.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA*SNORK*HAHAHAHAHAHA

And you kept responding just like a little trained puppy. Does not
matter if you used someone elses post, you were responding to me. You
no more could stop reading what I wrote than stop taking a piss in the
morning. Plonk means, YOU stop reading and especially responding, not
me cupcake. I knew you were entirely too weak to actually plonk me.


Who's the trained puppy? I remove the groups, you come back here and add
them in. Think you'd better take another assesment of the situation, Spot.

You sneck them so you can hide and pretend like you still have your
balls. I make sure they remain sitting upon my mantel in their glass
jar of formaldahyde.

Do you really think running and hiding after challenging people makes
you look smart?

Quote:





Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record.

To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience?
Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the
*audience*.

Not my audience. As soon as you come around, everyone else kills the
thread. Nope, sorry 'cupcake' it's just you and me. I'm addressing it to
you.

As pathetic a back pedal as I have seen since yesterday.

Since the last time you posted?

Wow, Mr. Herman, quite the comeback there. I have never seen anyone
use an IKYABWAI lame in response.

So you never did get around to explaining who was the audience for
that statement.
Quote:


You do understand the usage of *pronouns*, sparkles? When you say *he*
rather than *you* that means you are no longer addressing me. So who
were you addressing, sparkles, since it was not me?

You got the idea. That's all that matters.

So you did have an audience in mind. Would that be the all the people
who have killed the thread or all the people you here laughing in
*your group*? Since it is the same people explain how you could have
both as you stated.

Quote:




*snicker*

Yeah, everyone else in this group laughs at you, too.

So how does that fit in with:
:"everyone else kills the thread"
You just wrote that and then contradicted yourself in the very next
paragraph. Just how fucking stupid are you?

They put up with you for a few posts, then get tired with you. I'm the
only one that feels like wasting time with you, cause you sit up and beg
so well...

LOL, another wonderful toyota.tard back pedal.
Quote:



Maybe they support you in email, yeah, that is it. You have supporters
not reading the thread laughing in emails. Is that how it works?


Even if they did I wouldn't read them.

And you aren't very observant, since they "support' me right out in the
open.

No, they do not. Not a one, well Stupid Dick, but he is a brain dead
winger.

So here is a little toyota.tard test:
"They put up with you for a few posts, then get tired with you."
"it's just you and me."
"everyone else kills the thread"
"everyone else in this group laughs at you"

So while you are busy making up support for your stupidity, do parse
those four sentences and get back to me when you spot the incredibly
obvious inconguity. I'll be here a while so go ahead and use both
brain cells.


Quote:


But that's OK, you just keep on thinking you're 'winning'. That is what
matters, isn't it? Christmas is coming, too. Maybe you'll get a life
with a big red bow on it.

Winning what, sparkles? You see this as winning and losing? How pathetic
is that.

Who's talking about *victolly*? Not me. You seem to be obsessed with it.

Jebus fuck, please tell me you have never passed those genes on to any
poor unsuspecting child. That would be criminal.

Now, sparkles, go find anywhere where I used *victolly*. Read those
statements really careful, puddinhead. Parse them all the way to the
end. Make sure you tke note of the context and then get back to me
when you have figured out just how stupid was your preceding line.

Please also note the term is *victolly*. As a self described usenet
veteran you of course understand all about common usenet terminology.
Like what the derisive term *victolly* means? But the fact you tried
to use it to mean victory just compounds your obvious clueless nature.

Quote:












PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember,
sparkles?

Yeah...and?

Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those
scathing retorts.

In your case, about a nanosecond.

Had it written down in your book of lamery.


Now go with your standard "not worthy" response.

You seem to understand that already. I hate to keep stating the
obvious.

*snorkle*
Was being a predictable and lame wanker a lifelong dream of yours?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Hmm, no response. But it did get some nice IKYABWAI lamery above.

Nope, you did not make it to the bottom. HEE HEE HEE.

Yeah, I saw it.

So you admit you were doing IKYABWAI lames. Pathetic.

Quote:
So, what? Glad to see you seem to know what the Whole of
Usenet thinks. Once again, who cares?

*BOGGLE*
"Whole usenet", jaysus, you really cannot read, can you? Where did I
even imply anything about the "whole usenet"?

Quote:





See, I know how to use my newsreader. I can unplonk you at will,
then when I tire of your assinine rantings, plonk you again. Not
such a hard concept to grasp, really. Why does it seem to bother you
so?

Except anyone with a clue and is not a total moron understands just
what *plonk* means. To you it means *i'm scared and you make me look
bad so I will hide you from me*. To the nonspanktoi usenet it is
"Jebus Fuck, you are lame, go away" and there you stay. No *unplonk*
when you realize it did not work and you cannot keep yourself from
responding.

Wow, that is like a whole paragraph of spank that you just could not
wrap your pidgeon head around. Must be those *weak* arguments that
make you run away.

Gee, wonder why you avoided those paragraphs too. Been better if you
had snipped them and hoped I did not notice. I lie, I'd have put you
on the spit and rosted your lame ass.

--

Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005

Hammer of Thor - July, 2005

David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae.fc2.dformosa@dformosa.zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."

http://www.tweaknet.info/aratzio.html
Back to top
The Really Bad Poetry Ins
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:06 pm    Post subject: Re: Pop Quiz: What's wrong with Bob? Reply with quote

It can't be worse than McGonagall

Here we go.................

McGonagall

A Descriptive Poem on the Silvery Tay
Beautiful silvery Tay,
With your landscapes, so lovely and gay,
Along each side of your waters, to Perth all the way;
No other river in the world has got scenery more fine,
Only I am told the beautiful Rhine,
Near to Wormit Bay, it seems very fine,
Where the Railway Bridge is towering above its waters sublime,
And the beautiful ship Mars,
With her Juvenile Tars,
Both lively and gay,
Does carelessly lie
By night and by day,
In the beautiful Bay
Of the silvery Tay.
Beautiful, beautiful! silvery Tay,
Thy scenery is enchanting on a fine summer day,
Near by Balmerino it is beautiful to behold,
When the trees are in full bloom and the cornfields seems like gold -
And nature's face seems gay,
And the lambkins they do play,
And the humming bee is on the wing,
It is enough to make one sing,
While they carelessly do stray,
Along the beautiful banks of the silvery Tay,
Beautiful silvery Tay, rolling smoothly on your way,
Near by Newport, as clear as the day,
Thy scenery around is charming I'll be bound...
And would make the heart of any one feel light and gay on a fine summer
day, To view the beautiful scenery along the banks of the silvery Tay.

Quote:
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.


"smallfoot" <walk@but.softly> wrote in message
news:boxdwqiekjncdjusarxxcmie@blue.flame...
In article <dn67i0$37o$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>, Robert Peffers decided
to try to bore everyone in the universe with this crap:

"Darrell" <spam@this.eh> wrote in message
news:Cu6dnaXCnf0x1AveRVn-pg@rogers.com...
Dick Scoville just plunges his head up his ass and starts to shout.





Why didn't Robert add any new text before posting his response?

a) He doesn't know how to use Outlook Express.

b) He's fucking stupid.

c) He thinks that by clipping soc.culture.scottish and then posting a
nothing response, the thread will magically disappear from that specific
group.

d) He forgot.

Answer

(Feel free to specify more than one selection.)
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.




--
This post is in response to the vexatious crosspostings
Back to top
Daedalus
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:42 am    Post subject: Re: Please keep scs in the headers Reply with quote

On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 00:01:05 -0500, smallfoot <walk@but.softly>, wrote:

Quote:
In article <dn78rr$slg$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, Robert Peffers decided
to try to bore everyone in the universe with this crap:

"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:061220052113543598%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
Peter J Ross <pjr@kookbusters.org> wrote:

On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:24:31 +1300, Adam Whyte-Settlar
grawillers@hotmail.com> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:

[nothing]

Are you an ordinary spammer or a Clan Warlord spammer?

Another crop of blank-posting kooks? Who put too much Miracle-Gro on
the bedding this time?

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy

"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."

"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."

-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004

"I am a sean being from another planet."
-- Darla aka Dr. Why aka Dr. Yubiwan aka Silouen aka ...



Oh, look, another blank response from Bob. Do parts of the UK have
something odd in the drinking water, or is there just something odd
about Bob?

I think it's that Bob is odd because he doesn't drink the water.
Perhaps he's posting froma pub and trying to type telepathically.

Jade
Back to top
smallfoot
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 3:41 am    Post subject: Bob the broken record Reply with quote

In article <dn9iic$gqj$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>, Robert Peffers moaned:
Quote:
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
Smallfoot, you are just getting yourself involved in a flamewar. It was not
instigated by me. However as you seem to want to be involved - so be it.
[more of the same clipped]


LOL. When Bob *does* write something, he repeats it over and over and
over again. I'm not quite sure, but I think this is his idea of a
"flame" or something.
Back to top
Dennis M. Hammes
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:10 am    Post subject: Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate Reply with quote

bru wrote:

Quote:
Another doomed hopeful leaps boldly into the Usenet scrum:

rocky wrote:

On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:50:02 -0600, "Dennis M. Hammes"
scrawlmark@arvig.net> wrote:

rocky wrote:


On 27 Nov 2005 21:31:47 -0800, "Hachiroku" <pimp.timid@gmail.com
wrote:



I can get my finger in to the second knuckle and hit the 'sweet spot'
but then my wrist always seems to cramp up. I'm fully lubed and it
feels good but I can't seem to do it long enough to milk my own
prostate to orgasm. Any pointers?



a handgrinade. don't forget to pull the pin out first.



"...handgrinaid"? Vaseline?

yeah, or a claymore.



That's "more clay," though he might want to try a pair of bazookas.


There is a special reason why the words:

This Side Towards the Enemy!

Appear on the casing.


That's because when /he/ stimulates his prostate, the words "contains
no artificial preservatives" appear on the casing.

--
-------(m+
~/:o)_|
If a pome falls in the middle of a library and
the Bishop can't read it, does it still say, "Iamb"?
http://scrawlmark.org
Back to top
The Really Bad Poetry Ins
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 11:48 pm    Post subject: Re: Please keep scs in the headers Reply with quote

It can't be worse than McGonagall

It can't be worse than McGonagall

Today's Scottish Cultural Gem is Mcgonagall's:

A Humble Heroine

Twas at the Seige of Matagarda, during the Peninsular War,
That a Mrs Reston for courage outshone any man there by far;
She was the wife of a Scottish soldier in Matagarda Port,
And to attend to her husband she there did resort.
'Twas in the Spring of the year 1810,
That General Sir Thomas Graham occupied Matagarda with 150 men;
These consisted of a detachment from the Scots Brigade,
And on that occasion they weren't in the least afraid.
And Captain Maclaine of the 94th did the whole of them command,
And the courage the men displayed was really grand;
Because they held Matagarda for fifty-four days,
Against o'erwhelming numbers of the French - therefore they are worthy
of praise.
The British were fighting on behalf of Spain,
But if they fought on their behalf they didn't fight in vain;
For they beat them manfully by land and sea,
And from the shores of Spain they were forced to flee.
Because Captain Maclaine set about repairing the old fort,
So as to make it comfortable for his men to resort;
And there he kept his men at work day by day,
Filling sand-bags and stuffing them in the walls without delay.
There was one woman in the fort during those trying dags,
A Mrs Reston, who is worthy of great praise;
She acted like a ministering angel to the soldiers while there,
By helping them to fill sand-bags, it was her constant care.
Mrs Reston behaved as fearlessly as any soldier in the garrison,
And amongst the soldiers golden opinions she won,
For her presence was everywhere amongst the men,
And the service invaluable she rendered to them.
Methinks I see that brave heroine carrying her child,
Whilst the bullets were falling around her, enough to drive her wild;
And bending over it to protect it from danger,
Because to war's alarms it was a stranger.
And while the shells shrieked around, and their fragments did scatter,
She was serving the men at the guns with wine and water;
And while the shot whistled around, her courage wasn't slack,
Because to the soldiers she carried sand-bags on her back.
A little drummer boy was told to fetch water from the well,
But he was afraid because the bullets from the enemy around it fell;
And the Doctor cried to the boy, Why are you standing there?
But Mrs Reston said, Doctor, the bairn is feared, I do declare.
And she said, Give me the pail, laddie, I'll fetch the water,
Not fearing that the shot would her brains scatter;
And without a moment's hesitation she took the pail,
Whilst the shot whirred thick around her, yet her courage didn't fail.
And to see that heroic woman the scene was most grand,
Because as she drew the water a shot cut the rope in her hand;
But she caught the pail with her hand dexterously,
Oh! the scene was imposing end most beautiful to see.
The British fought bravely, as they are always willing to do,
Although their numbers were but few;
So they kept up the cannonading with their artillery,
And stood manfully at their guns against the enemy.
And five times the flagstaff was shot away,
And as often was it replaced without dismay;
And the flag was fastened to an angle of the wall,
And the British resolved to defend it whatever did befall.
So the French were beaten and were glad to run,
And the British for defeating them golden opinions have won
Ah through brave Captain Maclaine and his heroes bold,
Likewise Mrs Reston, whose name should be written in letters of
gold.Historical Note
Matagorda was an outlying fort in the defences of Cadiz - one of the few
Spanish cities not occupied by the French in early 1810. It was occupied
on 22 February 1810 by a detachment British artillery and a company of
the 94th(Scots Brigade) Regiment under Captain Maclaine. Aided by a
Spanish flotilla, the garrison held on to their exposed post until 21st
April, when superior numbers of French guns drove away the Spanish
gunboats and hammered the fort for thirty hours.

The courage of Mrs. Reston during this bombardment (though he disagrees
about her name) was noted by Sir William Napier in his History of the
Peninsular War (Book X, Chapt 5):
And here must be recorded an action of which it is difficult to say
whether it were most feminine or heroic. A sergeant's wife named Retson,
was in a
casemate with the wounded men when a very young drummer boy was
ordered to fetch water from the well of the fort; seeing the child
hesitate, she snatched the vessel from his hand, braved the terrible
cannonade herself and though a shot cut the bucket-cord from her hold,
she recovered it and fulfilled her mission.
Contrary to McGonagall's patriotic conclusion, the newly arrived General
Graham ordered a withdrawal from Matagorda which they did on the 22nd
April, having suffered 64 casualties from an original force of 140 men.
Their gallant commander eventually became General Sir Archibald
Maclaine.



--
This post is in response to the vexatious crosspostings
of David Spencer Hines and his coterie of hangers-on.
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Auto-Forums.net Forum Index -> Toyota All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Page 6 of 6

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Bad Credit Auto Loans - Ford Dealer - Auto loans bad credit - Car Insurance Quotes




Powered by phpBB