| Author |
Message |
Darrell
Guest
|
 Posted:
Wed Dec 07, 2005 8:32 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
Dick Scoville just plunges his head up his ass and starts to shout.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Robert Peffers
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Dec 07, 2005 9:18 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
"Darrell" <spam@this.eh> wrote in message
news:Cu6dnaXCnf0x1AveRVn-pg@rogers.com...
| Quote: | Dick Scoville just plunges his head up his ass and starts to shout.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Art Deco
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Dec 07, 2005 9:18 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote:
| Quote: | On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:54:27 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:55:00 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:55:48 +0000, Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:24:50 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS
transparently proposed:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:35:43 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.GTS
posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan@neubauten.org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81@news02.roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS
posted
something accessible as
news:pan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873@ae86.GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature
of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context
for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.
YHBT!
Yeah, I guess.
But you need a spell checker.
"Poast" is intentional.
Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing
your
ass!
That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)
Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.
You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me
hook,
line and sinker!
One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three
more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone
savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the
trap
to be sprung.
You sprung it one or two posts too soon.
Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it,
so I pull
out early.
*blinks*
*ahem*
Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!
But an excellent job nonetheless!
You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of
Trolling
is not lost!)
Oh, it's alive and *very* well.
Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved.
There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a
nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm
after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even
if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one,
as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line
community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.
I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I
haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good
old days!'
LOL!
If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you,
you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!
Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.
Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.
And did you spot yourself out in the first?
Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle
when you stood up?
And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite
amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again.
*snorkle*
As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back
when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out
as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking
and cries of *victolly*.
*snorkle*
You're just an idiot.
"you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!"
Yeah...and?
Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are.
Maybe you'll convince yourself of that someday. Who have you spanked?
Well, lets see, how about when I predicted you would start froup
snecking and declare *victolly* and within 30 minutes you did. How
about when you claimed you were not reading my posts and kept
responding by proxy whining you were not reading my posts. That is
just two. Would you like more my little spanktoi?
Why should I weant to respond to a bunch of groups I don't suscribe to?
Like you can help yourself. You hide behind killfiles and respond
*vicariously* (hee hee that one killed me). But no, you snecked the
froups and declared *victolly* hoping no one from AUK had subbed
toyota.tard.land. Not quite the same, now is it, sparkles?
So what?
That one makes no sense at all. You wanna play in the Toyota group, play
there. I don't really need your 'audience' to serve up what a fool you are.
But you needed an audience to declare your *victolly* and hoped no one
really saw you were running and hiding. Not quite the same, now is it,
pumpkin?
I don't need nothing. You need to feed your ego by putting all the groups
back in. Personally, I really don't care one way or the other.
And you're wrong. I declared *victolly* in about 15 minutes. It's really
not all that hard to best you...you just keep on with the ssame old crap
over and over, just like you are now. Nothing new here...
Wow, there be the PKB of the *weak*. Another of your oh so standarized
responses. Has any of your lamery worked, ever?
LOL! *YOU* talking about 'standardized responses'?! That's a GOOD one!
I wasn't reading your posts, I was reading other's responses to you weak
arguements. Little bit of a difference there, Sunshine.
As I said, you were "responding by proxy", reading impaired on top of
being a liar. Probably have not a clue what that statement meant.
So?
"You plonked me!!! You plonked me!!" Yeah, so what?
Hee Hee, public plonkings and hoping against hope everyone will just
stop smacking you around. Yeah, how's that workin out for ya?
Who's smacking me around? I don't see anyone smacking me around.
And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would.
I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake".
Nothing new, just the same old crap.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE
RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU!
Yup...exactly. Even though you've been told you were plonked you kept
responding and kept responding. And still you just keep on coming back.
Maybe the way you entered it above is the way it played in your little
mind.
|
Hi, Spank! Maybe someday you'll understand what the work means.
| Quote: |
Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record.
To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience?
Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the
*audience*.
Not my audience. As soon as you come around, everyone else kills the
thread. Nope, sorry 'cupcake' it's just you and me. I'm addressing it to
you.
*snicker*
Yeah, everyone else in this group laughs at you, too.
|
I'll bet they all support you in email, too.
| Quote: |
But that's OK, you just keep on thinking you're 'winning'. That is what
matters, isn't it? Christmas is coming, too. Maybe you'll get a life with
a big red bow on it.
|
Yet here you are again.
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy
"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."
"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."
-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004
"I am a sean being from another planet."
-- Darla aka Dr. Why aka Dr. Yubiwan aka Silouen aka ...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aratzio
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Dec 07, 2005 9:18 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 04:13:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
| Quote: | On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:54:27 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:55:00 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:55:48 +0000, Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:24:50 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS
transparently proposed:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:35:43 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan@neubauten.org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81@news02.roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:pan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873@ae86.GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.
YHBT!
Yeah, I guess.
But you need a spell checker.
"Poast" is intentional.
Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your
ass!
That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)
Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.
You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook,
line and sinker!
One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap
to be sprung.
You sprung it one or two posts too soon.
Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull
out early.
*blinks*
*ahem*
Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!
But an excellent job nonetheless!
You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling
is not lost!)
Oh, it's alive and *very* well.
Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.
I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!'
LOL!
If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!
Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.
Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.
And did you spot yourself out in the first?
Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle
when you stood up?
And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite
amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again.
*snorkle*
As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back
when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out
as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking
and cries of *victolly*.
*snorkle*
You're just an idiot.
"you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!"
Yeah...and?
Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are.
Maybe you'll convince yourself of that someday. Who have you spanked?
Well, lets see, how about when I predicted you would start froup
snecking and declare *victolly* and within 30 minutes you did. How
about when you claimed you were not reading my posts and kept
responding by proxy whining you were not reading my posts. That is
just two. Would you like more my little spanktoi?
Why should I weant to respond to a bunch of groups I don't suscribe to?
Like you can help yourself. You hide behind killfiles and respond
*vicariously* (hee hee that one killed me). But no, you snecked the
froups and declared *victolly* hoping no one from AUK had subbed
toyota.tard.land. Not quite the same, now is it, sparkles?
So what?
|
WHoa, incisive! I mean not like you've not used that everytime you
were stumped by facts.
| Quote: |
That one makes no sense at all. You wanna play in the Toyota group, play
there. I don't really need your 'audience' to serve up what a fool you are.
But you needed an audience to declare your *victolly* and hoped no one
really saw you were running and hiding. Not quite the same, now is it,
pumpkin?
I don't need nothing. You need to feed your ego by putting all the groups
back in. Personally, I really don't care one way or the other.
|
*snicker*
Which is why you post your *victolly* dances and screed bombs about
*the old days* blah blah blah.
| Quote: |
And you're wrong. I declared *victolly* in about 15 minutes. It's really
not all that hard to best you...you just keep on with the ssame old crap
over and over, just like you are now. Nothing new here...
Wow, there be the PKB of the *weak*. Another of your oh so standarized
responses. Has any of your lamery worked, ever?
LOL! *YOU* talking about 'standardized responses'?! That's a GOOD one!
|
RUH ROH SCOOBY. Did you happen to work your way to the end, queeny?
I peeked, nope you did not. HEE HEE HEE. <preens>
| Quote: |
I wasn't reading your posts, I was reading other's responses to you weak
arguements. Little bit of a difference there, Sunshine.
As I said, you were "responding by proxy", reading impaired on top of
being a liar. Probably have not a clue what that statement meant.
So?
|
Okay since you just admitted you have no clue what "responding by
proxy" means would you like it in words of less than two *sylabels*
| Quote: |
"You plonked me!!! You plonked me!!" Yeah, so what?
Hee Hee, public plonkings and hoping against hope everyone will just
stop smacking you around. Yeah, how's that workin out for ya?
Who's smacking me around? I don't see anyone smacking me around.
|
That would be due to brain damage from the constant bitch slappings.
So how did that whole "I'm hiding behing my killfile work out"?
| Quote: |
And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would.
I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake".
Nothing new, just the same old crap.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE
RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU!
Yup...exactly. Even though you've been told you were plonked you kept
responding and kept responding. And still you just keep on coming back.
Maybe the way you entered it above is the way it played in your little
mind.
|
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA*SNORK*HAHAHAHAHAHA
And you kept responding just like a little trained puppy. Does not
matter if you used someone elses post, you were responding to me. You
no more could stop reading what I wrote than stop taking a piss in the
morning. Plonk means, YOU stop reading and especially responding, not
me cupcake. I knew you were entirely too weak to actually plonk me.
| Quote: |
Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record.
To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience?
Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the
*audience*.
Not my audience. As soon as you come around, everyone else kills the
thread. Nope, sorry 'cupcake' it's just you and me. I'm addressing it to
you.
|
As pathetic a back pedal as I have seen since yesterday.
You do understand the usage of *pronouns*, sparkles? When you say *he*
rather than *you* that means you are no longer addressing me. So who
were you addressing, sparkles, since it was not me?
| Quote: |
*snicker*
Yeah, everyone else in this group laughs at you, too.
|
So how does that fit in with:
:"everyone else kills the thread"
You just wrote that and then contradicted yourself in the very next
paragraph. Just how fucking stupid are you?
Maybe they support you in email, yeah, that is it. You have supporters
not reading the thread laughing in emails. Is that how it works?
| Quote: |
But that's OK, you just keep on thinking you're 'winning'. That is what
matters, isn't it? Christmas is coming, too. Maybe you'll get a life with
a big red bow on it.
|
Winning what, sparkles? You see this as winning and losing? How
pathetic is that.
| Quote: |
PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles?
Yeah...and?
Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those scathing
retorts.
In your case, about a nanosecond.
Had it written down in your book of lamery.
Now go with your standard "not worthy" response.
You seem to understand that already. I hate to keep stating the obvious.
*snorkle*
Was being a predictable and lame wanker a lifelong dream of yours?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Hmm, no response. But it did get some nice IKYABWAI lamery above.
|
Nope, you did not make it to the bottom. HEE HEE HEE.
| Quote: |
See, I know how to use my newsreader. I can unplonk you at will, then when
I tire of your assinine rantings, plonk you again. Not such a hard
concept to grasp, really. Why does it seem to bother you so?
Except anyone with a clue and is not a total moron understands just
what *plonk* means. To you it means *i'm scared and you make me look
bad so I will hide you from me*. To the nonspanktoi usenet it is
"Jebus Fuck, you are lame, go away" and there you stay. No *unplonk*
when you realize it did not work and you cannot keep yourself from
responding.
Wow, that is like a whole paragraph of spank that you just could not
wrap your pidgeon head around. Must be those *weak* arguments that
make you run away.
|
--
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005
Hammer of Thor - July, 2005
David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae.fc2.dformosa@dformosa.zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."
http://www.tweaknet.info/aratzio.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aratzio
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Dec 07, 2005 9:18 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:55:00 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
| Quote: | On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:55:48 +0000, Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:24:50 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS
transparently proposed:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:35:43 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan@neubauten.org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81@news02.roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:pan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873@ae86.GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.
YHBT!
Yeah, I guess.
But you need a spell checker.
"Poast" is intentional.
Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your
ass!
That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)
Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.
You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook,
line and sinker!
One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap
to be sprung.
You sprung it one or two posts too soon.
Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull
out early.
*blinks*
*ahem*
Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!
But an excellent job nonetheless!
You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling
is not lost!)
Oh, it's alive and *very* well.
Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.
I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!'
LOL!
If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!
Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.
Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.
And did you spot yourself out in the first?
Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle
when you stood up?
And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite
amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again.
*snorkle*
As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back
when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out
as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking
and cries of *victolly*.
*snorkle*
You're just an idiot.
"you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!"
Yeah...and?
Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are.
Maybe you'll convince yourself of that someday. Who have you spanked?
Well, lets see, how about when I predicted you would start froup
snecking and declare *victolly* and within 30 minutes you did. How
about when you claimed you were not reading my posts and kept
responding by proxy whining you were not reading my posts. That is
just two. Would you like more my little spanktoi?
Why should I weant to respond to a bunch of groups I don't suscribe to?
|
Like you can help yourself. You hide behind killfiles and respond
*vicariously* (hee hee that one killed me). But no, you snecked the
froups and declared *victolly* hoping no one from AUK had subbed
toyota.tard.land. Not quite the same, now is it, sparkles?
| Quote: | That one makes no sense at all. You wanna play in the Toyota group, play
there. I don't really need your 'audience' to serve up what a fool you are.
|
But you needed an audience to declare your *victolly* and hoped no one
really saw you were running and hiding. Not quite the same, now is it,
pumpkin?
| Quote: |
And you're wrong. I declared *victolly* in about 15 minutes. It's really
not all that hard to best you...you just keep on with the ssame old crap
over and over, just like you are now. Nothing new here...
|
Wow, there be the PKB of the *weak*. Another of your oh so standarized
responses. Has any of your lamery worked, ever?
| Quote: |
I wasn't reading your posts, I was reading other's responses to you weak
arguements. Little bit of a difference there, Sunshine.
|
As I said, you were "responding by proxy", reading impaired on top of
being a liar. Probably have not a clue what that statement meant.
| Quote: |
"You plonked me!!! You plonked me!!" Yeah, so what?
|
Hee Hee, public plonkings and hoping against hope everyone will just
stop smacking you around. Yeah, how's that workin out for ya?
| Quote: |
And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would.
I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake".
Nothing new, just the same old crap.
|
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE
RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU!
| Quote: |
Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record.
|
To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience?
Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the
*audience*.
*snicker*
| Quote: |
PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles?
Yeah...and?
Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those scathing
retorts.
In your case, about a nanosecond.
Had it written down in your book of lamery.
Now go with your standard "not worthy" response.
You seem to understand that already. I hate to keep stating the obvious.
*snorkle*
Was being a predictable and lame wanker a lifelong dream of yours?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
Hmm, no response. But it did get some nice IKYABWAI lamery above.
| Quote: |
See, I know how to use my newsreader. I can unplonk you at will, then when
I tire of your assinine rantings, plonk you again. Not such a hard
concept to grasp, really. Why does it seem to bother you so?
Except anyone with a clue and is not a total moron understands just
what *plonk* means. To you it means *i'm scared and you make me look
bad so I will hide you from me*. To the nonspanktoi usenet it is
"Jebus Fuck, you are lame, go away" and there you stay. No *unplonk*
when you realize it did not work and you cannot keep yourself from
responding.
|
Wow, that is like a whole paragraph of spank that you just could not
wrap your pidgeon head around. Must be those *weak* arguments that
make you run away.
--
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005
Hammer of Thor - July, 2005
David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae.fc2.dformosa@dformosa.zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."
http://www.tweaknet.info/aratzio.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hachiroku
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Dec 07, 2005 9:18 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:54:27 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
| Quote: | On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:55:00 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:55:48 +0000, Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:24:50 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS
transparently proposed:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:35:43 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan@neubauten.org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81@news02.roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:pan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873@ae86.GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.
YHBT!
Yeah, I guess.
But you need a spell checker.
"Poast" is intentional.
Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your
ass!
That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)
Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.
You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook,
line and sinker!
One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap
to be sprung.
You sprung it one or two posts too soon.
Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull
out early.
*blinks*
*ahem*
Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!
But an excellent job nonetheless!
You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling
is not lost!)
Oh, it's alive and *very* well.
Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.
I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!'
LOL!
If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!
Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.
Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.
And did you spot yourself out in the first?
Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle
when you stood up?
And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite
amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again.
*snorkle*
As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back
when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out
as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking
and cries of *victolly*.
*snorkle*
You're just an idiot.
"you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!"
Yeah...and?
Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are.
Maybe you'll convince yourself of that someday. Who have you spanked?
Well, lets see, how about when I predicted you would start froup
snecking and declare *victolly* and within 30 minutes you did. How
about when you claimed you were not reading my posts and kept
responding by proxy whining you were not reading my posts. That is
just two. Would you like more my little spanktoi?
Why should I weant to respond to a bunch of groups I don't suscribe to?
Like you can help yourself. You hide behind killfiles and respond
*vicariously* (hee hee that one killed me). But no, you snecked the
froups and declared *victolly* hoping no one from AUK had subbed
toyota.tard.land. Not quite the same, now is it, sparkles?
|
So what?
| Quote: |
That one makes no sense at all. You wanna play in the Toyota group, play
there. I don't really need your 'audience' to serve up what a fool you are.
But you needed an audience to declare your *victolly* and hoped no one
really saw you were running and hiding. Not quite the same, now is it,
pumpkin?
|
I don't need nothing. You need to feed your ego by putting all the groups
back in. Personally, I really don't care one way or the other.
| Quote: |
And you're wrong. I declared *victolly* in about 15 minutes. It's really
not all that hard to best you...you just keep on with the ssame old crap
over and over, just like you are now. Nothing new here...
Wow, there be the PKB of the *weak*. Another of your oh so standarized
responses. Has any of your lamery worked, ever?
|
LOL! *YOU* talking about 'standardized responses'?! That's a GOOD one!
| Quote: |
I wasn't reading your posts, I was reading other's responses to you weak
arguements. Little bit of a difference there, Sunshine.
As I said, you were "responding by proxy", reading impaired on top of
being a liar. Probably have not a clue what that statement meant.
|
So?
| Quote: |
"You plonked me!!! You plonked me!!" Yeah, so what?
Hee Hee, public plonkings and hoping against hope everyone will just
stop smacking you around. Yeah, how's that workin out for ya?
|
Who's smacking me around? I don't see anyone smacking me around.
| Quote: |
And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would.
I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake".
Nothing new, just the same old crap.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE
RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU!
|
Yup...exactly. Even though you've been told you were plonked you kept
responding and kept responding. And still you just keep on coming back.
Maybe the way you entered it above is the way it played in your little
mind.
| Quote: |
Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record.
To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience?
Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the
*audience*.
|
Not my audience. As soon as you come around, everyone else kills the
thread. Nope, sorry 'cupcake' it's just you and me. I'm addressing it to
you.
Yeah, everyone else in this group laughs at you, too.
But that's OK, you just keep on thinking you're 'winning'. That is what
matters, isn't it? Christmas is coming, too. Maybe you'll get a life with
a big red bow on it.
| Quote: |
PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles?
Yeah...and?
Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those scathing
retorts.
In your case, about a nanosecond.
Had it written down in your book of lamery.
Now go with your standard "not worthy" response.
You seem to understand that already. I hate to keep stating the obvious.
*snorkle*
Was being a predictable and lame wanker a lifelong dream of yours?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Hmm, no response. But it did get some nice IKYABWAI lamery above.
See, I know how to use my newsreader. I can unplonk you at will, then when
I tire of your assinine rantings, plonk you again. Not such a hard
concept to grasp, really. Why does it seem to bother you so?
Except anyone with a clue and is not a total moron understands just
what *plonk* means. To you it means *i'm scared and you make me look
bad so I will hide you from me*. To the nonspanktoi usenet it is
"Jebus Fuck, you are lame, go away" and there you stay. No *unplonk*
when you realize it did not work and you cannot keep yourself from
responding.
Wow, that is like a whole paragraph of spank that you just could not
wrap your pidgeon head around. Must be those *weak* arguments that
make you run away.
|
--
Have your Virtual Pet spayed/neutered!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Art Deco
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Dec 07, 2005 9:18 am Post subject:
Re: Please remove scs from the headers |
|
|
Peter J Ross <pjr@kookbusters.org> wrote:
| Quote: | On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:24:31 +1300, Adam Whyte-Settlar
grawillers@hotmail.com> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
[nothing]
Are you an ordinary spammer or a Clan Warlord spammer?
|
Another crop of blank-posting kooks? Who put too much Miracle-Gro on
the bedding this time?
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy
"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."
"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."
-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004
"I am a sean being from another planet."
-- Darla aka Dr. Why aka Dr. Yubiwan aka Silouen aka ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bru
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Dec 08, 2005 2:15 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
Another doomed hopeful leaps boldly into the Usenet scrum:
| Quote: | rocky wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:50:02 -0600, "Dennis M. Hammes"
scrawlmark@arvig.net> wrote:
rocky wrote:
On 27 Nov 2005 21:31:47 -0800, "Hachiroku" <pimp.timid@gmail.com
wrote:
I can get my finger in to the second knuckle and hit the 'sweet spot'
but then my wrist always seems to cramp up. I'm fully lubed and it
feels good but I can't seem to do it long enough to milk my own
prostate to orgasm. Any pointers?
a handgrinade. don't forget to pull the pin out first.
"...handgrinaid"? Vaseline?
yeah, or a claymore.
That's "more clay," though he might want to try a pair of bazookas.
|
There is a special reason why the words:
This Side Towards the Enemy!
Appear on the casing.
--
Brugman Mooivinger |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jennifer
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Dec 08, 2005 2:37 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
bru wrote:
| Quote: | Another doomed hopeful leaps boldly into the Usenet scrum:
rocky wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:50:02 -0600, "Dennis M. Hammes"
scrawlmark@arvig.net> wrote:
rocky wrote:
On 27 Nov 2005 21:31:47 -0800, "Hachiroku" <pimp.timid@gmail.com
wrote:
I can get my finger in to the second knuckle and hit the 'sweet spot'
but then my wrist always seems to cramp up. I'm fully lubed and it
feels good but I can't seem to do it long enough to milk my own
prostate to orgasm. Any pointers?
a handgrinade. don't forget to pull the pin out first.
"...handgrinaid"? Vaseline?
yeah, or a claymore.
That's "more clay," though he might want to try a pair of bazookas.
There is a special reason why the words:
This Side Towards the Enemy!
Appear on the casing.
|
The Beer Barrel Polka
(Brown-Tim-Vejvoda)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There's a garden, what a garden
Only happy faces bloom there
And there's never any room
For a worry or a gloom
There's music, and there's dancing
And a lot of sweet romancing
When they play the polka
They all get in the swing
Everytime you hear that Oom-pah-pah
Everbody feels so tra-la-la-la
They only want to come back for one thing
They crowd around and sing trolly-olly-ay
And you hear that rumble on the floor
It's a big (HA HA HA HA) surprise you're waiting for
Then all at once everybody, everybody, forms a ring
(Spoken: Come on everybody get up and form a ring. That's
the way, everybody get up and form a big ring. That's the way.
Then all at once you form a ring. Everybody get up and form a
ring. Here's a tenth of everybody....)
For miles around, you'll hear them sing
Roll out the barrel, We'll have a barrel of fun
Roll out the barrel, we've got the blues on the run
Zing Boom Terrara
Join in a glass of good cheer
Now it's time to roll the barrel
For the gang's all here (Spoken: Take it away boys!)
| Quote: |
--
Brugman Mooivinger |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bru
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Dec 08, 2005 3:33 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
Another doomed hopeful leaps boldly into the Usenet scrum:
| Quote: |
bru wrote:
Another doomed hopeful leaps boldly into the Usenet scrum:
rocky wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:50:02 -0600, "Dennis M. Hammes"
scrawlmark@arvig.net> wrote:
rocky wrote:
On 27 Nov 2005 21:31:47 -0800, "Hachiroku" <pimp.timid@gmail.com
wrote:
I can get my finger in to the second knuckle and hit the 'sweet spot'
but then my wrist always seems to cramp up. I'm fully lubed and it
feels good but I can't seem to do it long enough to milk my own
prostate to orgasm. Any pointers?
a handgrinade. don't forget to pull the pin out first.
"...handgrinaid"? Vaseline?
yeah, or a claymore.
That's "more clay," though he might want to try a pair of bazookas.
There is a special reason why the words:
This Side Towards the Enemy!
Appear on the casing.
The Beer Barrel Polka
(Brown-Tim-Vejvoda)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
There's a garden, what a garden
Only happy faces bloom there
And there's never any room
For a worry or a gloom
There's music, and there's dancing
And a lot of sweet romancing
When they play the polka
They all get in the swing
Everytime you hear that Oom-pah-pah
Everbody feels so tra-la-la-la
They only want to come back for one thing
They crowd around and sing trolly-olly-ay
And you hear that rumble on the floor
It's a big (HA HA HA HA) surprise you're waiting for
Then all at once everybody, everybody, forms a ring
(Spoken: Come on everybody get up and form a ring. That's
the way, everybody get up and form a big ring. That's the way.
Then all at once you form a ring. Everybody get up and form a
ring. Here's a tenth of everybody....)
For miles around, you'll hear them sing
Roll out the barrel, We'll have a barrel of fun
Roll out the barrel, we've got the blues on the run
Zing Boom Terrara
Join in a glass of good cheer
Now it's time to roll the barrel
For the gang's all here (Spoken: Take it away boys!)
|
The Death of Captain Ward
'Twas about the beginning of the past century
Billy Bowls was pressed into the British Navy,
And conveyed on board the "Waterwitch" without delay,
Scarce getting time to bid farewell to the villagers of Fairway.
And once on board the "Waterwitch" he resolved to do his duty,
And if he returned safe home he'd marry Nelly Blyth, his beauty;
And he'd fight for old England like a jolly British tar,
And the thought of Nelly Blyth would solace him during the war.
Poor fellow, he little thought what he had to go through,
But in all his trials at sea he never did rue;
No, the brave tar became reconciled to his fate,
And felt proud of his commander, Captain Ward the Great.
And on board the "Waterwitch" was Tom Riggles, his old comrade,
And with such a comrade he seldom felt afraid;
Because the stories they told each other made the time pass quickly
away,
And made their hearts feel light and gay.
'Twas on a Sunday morning and clear to the view,
Captain Ward the attention of his men he drew;
"Look!" he cried, "There's two French men-of-war our right,
Therefore prepare, my lads, immediately to begin the fight."
Then the " Waterwitch" was steered to the ship that was most near,
While every men resolved to sell their lives most dear;
But the French commander disinclined to engage in the fight,
And he ordered his men to put on a press of canvas and take to flight.
Then Captain Ward gave the order to fire,
Then Billy Bowls cried, "Now we'll get fighting to our hearts' desire";
And for an hour a running fight was maintained,
And the two ships of the enemy near upon the "Waterwitch" gained.
Captain Ward walked the deck with a firm tread,
When a shot from the enemy pierced the ship, yet he felt no dread;
But with a splinter Bill Bowls was wounded on the left arm,
And he cried, "Death to the frog-eaters, they have done me little harm."
Then Captain Ward cried, "Fear not, my men, we will win the day,
Now, men, pour in a broadside without delay
Then they sailed around the "St. Denis" and the "Gloire,"
And in their cabin windows they poured a deadly fire.
The effect on the two ships was tremendous to behold,
But the Frenchmen stuck to their guns with courage bold;
And the crash and din of artillery was deafening to the ear,
And the cries of the wounded men ware pitiful to hear.
Then Captain Ward to his men did say,
"We must board the Frenchman without delay";
Then he seized his cutlass as he spoke,
And jumped on board the " St. Denis " in the midst of the smoke.
Then Bill Bowls and Tom Riggles hastily followed him,
Then, hand to hand, the battle did begin;
And the men sprang upon their foe and beat them back,
And hauled down their colours and hoisted the Union Jack.
But the men on board the "St. Denis" fought desperately hard,
And just as the "St. Denis" was captured a ball struck Captain Ward
Right on the forehead, and he fell without a groan,
And for the death of Captain Ward the men did moan.
Then the first lieutenant who was standing near by,
Loudly to the men did cry,
"Come, men, and carry your noble commander below;
But there's one consolation, we have beaten the foe."
And thus fell Captain Ward in the prime of life,
But I hope he is now in the better world free from strife;
But, alas! 'tis sad to think he was buried in the mighty deep,
Where too many of our brave seamen silently sleep.
Big Mog
--
Brugman Mooivinger |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hachiroku
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:52 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:06:23 -0700, Art Deco wrote:
| Quote: |
And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would.
I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake".
Nothing new, just the same old crap.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE
RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU!
Yup...exactly. Even though you've been told you were plonked you kept
responding and kept responding. And still you just keep on coming back.
Maybe the way you entered it above is the way it played in your little
mind.
Hi, Spank! Maybe someday you'll understand what the work means.
|
I have no problem understanding work whatsoever.
| Quote: |
Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record.
To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience?
Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the
*audience*.
Not my audience. As soon as you come around, everyone else kills the
thread. Nope, sorry 'cupcake' it's just you and me. I'm addressing it to
you.
*snicker*
Yeah, everyone else in this group laughs at you, too.
I'll bet they all support you in email, too.
|
Why would they do that? Most of them don't even have my e-mail. Only a
couple, and we keep it to 'important' stuff, not what the Trolls do in the
group.
Who cares?
| Quote: |
But that's OK, you just keep on thinking you're 'winning'. That is what
matters, isn't it? Christmas is coming, too. Maybe you'll get a life with
a big red bow on it.
Yet here you are again.
|
Here *I* am again??? Oh, the Irony!
| Quote: |
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy
"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."
|
Did it go fuck itself? ;)
| Quote: |
"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."
-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004
"I am a sean being from another planet."
-- Darla aka Dr. Why aka Dr. Yubiwan aka Silouen aka ...
|
--
Have your Virtual Pet spayed/neutered!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hachiroku
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Dec 08, 2005 6:17 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:57:14 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
| Quote: | Why should I weant to respond to a bunch of groups I don't suscribe to?
Like you can help yourself. You hide behind killfiles and respond
*vicariously* (hee hee that one killed me). But no, you snecked the
froups and declared *victolly* hoping no one from AUK had subbed
toyota.tard.land. Not quite the same, now is it, sparkles?
So what?
WHoa, incisive! I mean not like you've not used that everytime you
were stumped by facts.
|
HAHAHAHA! WHAT facts? And it takes a lot more that you to 'stump' me.
| Quote: |
That one makes no sense at all. You wanna play in the Toyota group, play
there. I don't really need your 'audience' to serve up what a fool you are.
But you needed an audience to declare your *victolly* and hoped no one
really saw you were running and hiding. Not quite the same, now is it,
pumpkin?
I don't need nothing. You need to feed your ego by putting all the groups
back in. Personally, I really don't care one way or the other.
*snicker*
Which is why you post your *victolly* dances and screed bombs about
*the old days* blah blah blah.
|
You mean, when Trolls had Brains?
| Quote: |
And you're wrong. I declared *victolly* in about 15 minutes. It's really
not all that hard to best you...you just keep on with the ssame old crap
over and over, just like you are now. Nothing new here...
Wow, there be the PKB of the *weak*. Another of your oh so standarized
responses. Has any of your lamery worked, ever?
LOL! *YOU* talking about 'standardized responses'?! That's a GOOD one!
RUH ROH SCOOBY. Did you happen to work your way to the end, queeny?
|
Nah...just the same old crap allover again, I'm sure.
| Quote: |
I peeked, nope you did not. HEE HEE HEE. <preens
|
Getting the lice out of your feathers?
| Quote: |
I wasn't reading your posts, I was reading other's responses to you weak
arguements. Little bit of a difference there, Sunshine.
As I said, you were "responding by proxy", reading impaired on top of
being a liar. Probably have not a clue what that statement meant.
So?
Okay since you just admitted you have no clue what "responding by
proxy" means would you like it in words of less than two *sylabels*
|
Who said I have no clue? "so" means, "Who gives a Fuck?"
| Quote: |
"You plonked me!!! You plonked me!!" Yeah, so what?
Hee Hee, public plonkings and hoping against hope everyone will just
stop smacking you around. Yeah, how's that workin out for ya?
Who's smacking me around? I don't see anyone smacking me around.
That would be due to brain damage from the constant bitch slappings.
|
Takes someone with a LOT more talent than you exhibit...
| Quote: |
So how did that whole "I'm hiding behing my killfile work out"?
|
The difference being?
| Quote: |
And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would.
I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake".
Nothing new, just the same old crap.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE
RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU!
Yup...exactly. Even though you've been told you were plonked you kept
responding and kept responding. And still you just keep on coming back.
Maybe the way you entered it above is the way it played in your little
mind.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA*SNORK*HAHAHAHAHAHA
And you kept responding just like a little trained puppy. Does not
matter if you used someone elses post, you were responding to me. You
no more could stop reading what I wrote than stop taking a piss in the
morning. Plonk means, YOU stop reading and especially responding, not
me cupcake. I knew you were entirely too weak to actually plonk me.
|
Who's the trained puppy? I remove the groups, you come back here and add
them in. Think you'd better take another assesment of the situation, Spot.
| Quote: |
Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record.
To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience?
Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the
*audience*.
Not my audience. As soon as you come around, everyone else kills the
thread. Nope, sorry 'cupcake' it's just you and me. I'm addressing it to
you.
As pathetic a back pedal as I have seen since yesterday.
|
Since the last time you posted?
| Quote: |
You do understand the usage of *pronouns*, sparkles? When you say *he*
rather than *you* that means you are no longer addressing me. So who
were you addressing, sparkles, since it was not me?
|
You got the idea. That's all that matters.
| Quote: |
*snicker*
Yeah, everyone else in this group laughs at you, too.
So how does that fit in with:
:"everyone else kills the thread"
You just wrote that and then contradicted yourself in the very next
paragraph. Just how fucking stupid are you?
|
They put up with you for a few posts, then get tired with you. I'm the
only one that feels like wasting time with you, cause you sit up and beg
so well...
| Quote: |
Maybe they support you in email, yeah, that is it. You have supporters
not reading the thread laughing in emails. Is that how it works?
|
Even if they did I wouldn't read them.
And you aren't very observant, since they "support' me right out in the
open.
| Quote: |
But that's OK, you just keep on thinking you're 'winning'. That is what
matters, isn't it? Christmas is coming, too. Maybe you'll get a life
with a big red bow on it.
Winning what, sparkles? You see this as winning and losing? How pathetic
is that.
|
Who's talking about *victolly*? Not me. You seem to be obsessed with it.
| Quote: |
PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember,
sparkles?
Yeah...and?
Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those
scathing retorts.
In your case, about a nanosecond.
Had it written down in your book of lamery.
Now go with your standard "not worthy" response.
You seem to understand that already. I hate to keep stating the
obvious.
*snorkle*
Was being a predictable and lame wanker a lifelong dream of yours?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Hmm, no response. But it did get some nice IKYABWAI lamery above.
Nope, you did not make it to the bottom. HEE HEE HEE.
|
Yeah, I saw it. So, what? Glad to see you seem to know what the Whole of
Usenet thinks. Once again, who cares?
| Quote: |
See, I know how to use my newsreader. I can unplonk you at will,
then when I tire of your assinine rantings, plonk you again. Not
such a hard concept to grasp, really. Why does it seem to bother you
so?
Except anyone with a clue and is not a total moron understands just
what *plonk* means. To you it means *i'm scared and you make me look
bad so I will hide you from me*. To the nonspanktoi usenet it is
"Jebus Fuck, you are lame, go away" and there you stay. No *unplonk*
when you realize it did not work and you cannot keep yourself from
responding.
Wow, that is like a whole paragraph of spank that you just could not
wrap your pidgeon head around. Must be those *weak* arguments that
make you run away.
--
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005
Hammer of Thor - July, 2005
David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005 Message-Id:
slrndlk3ae.fc2.dformosa@dformosa.zeta.org.au> "But it is not isolated
AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."
http://www.tweaknet.info/aratzio.html
|
--
Have your Virtual Pet spayed/neutered!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Art Deco
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Dec 08, 2005 8:36 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote:
| Quote: | On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:06:23 -0700, Art Deco wrote:
And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would.
I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake".
Nothing new, just the same old crap.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE
RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU!
Yup...exactly. Even though you've been told you were plonked you kept
responding and kept responding. And still you just keep on coming back.
Maybe the way you entered it above is the way it played in your little
mind.
Hi, Spank! Maybe someday you'll understand what the work means.
I have no problem understanding work whatsoever.
|
And Now, The Typo Lame!
| Quote: |
Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record.
To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience?
Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the
*audience*.
Not my audience. As soon as you come around, everyone else kills the
thread. Nope, sorry 'cupcake' it's just you and me. I'm addressing it to
you.
*snicker*
Yeah, everyone else in this group laughs at you, too.
I'll bet they all support you in email, too.
Why would they do that? Most of them don't even have my e-mail. Only a
couple, and we keep it to 'important' stuff, not what the Trolls do in the
group.
|
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH.
You obviously do, Spank.
| Quote: |
But that's OK, you just keep on thinking you're 'winning'. That is what
matters, isn't it? Christmas is coming, too. Maybe you'll get a life with
a big red bow on it.
Yet here you are again.
Here *I* am again??? Oh, the Irony!
|
I got it now, you are the only person posting to usenet that has "a
life." Thanks, Spank.
| Quote: |
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy
"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."
Did it go fuck itself? ;)
|
Did the quote marks confuse you, Spank?
| Quote: |
"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."
-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004
"I am a sean being from another planet."
-- Darla aka Dr. Why aka Dr. Yubiwan aka Silouen aka ...
|
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy
"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."
"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."
-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004
"I am a sean being from another planet."
-- Darla aka Dr. Why aka Dr. Yubiwan aka Silouen aka ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
A. Jinn
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Little Meow
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Dec 08, 2005 9:19 am Post subject:
Re: Pop Quiz: What's wrong with Bob? |
|
|
redc1c4 wrote in news:4397C262.E76F149D@drunkenbastards.org.ies:
| Quote: | smallfoot wrote:
In article <dn67i0$37o$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>, Robert Peffers decided
to try to bore everyone in the universe with this crap:
"Darrell" <spam@this.eh> wrote in message
news:Cu6dnaXCnf0x1AveRVn-pg@rogers.com...
Dick Scoville just plunges his head up his ass and starts to shout.
Why didn't Robert add any new text before posting his response?
a) He doesn't know how to use Outlook Express.
b) He's fucking stupid.
c) He thinks that by clipping soc.culture.scottish and then posting a
nothing response, the thread will magically disappear from that specific
group.
d) He forgot.
Answer
(Feel free to specify more than one selection.)
e) he's a booger eating moron.
f) all of the above.
redc1c4,
amused by it all..... %-)
|
g) He's a man who doesn't need to say anything, the look on his face
says it all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in