| Author |
Message |
Hachiroku
Guest
|
 Posted:
Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:14 pm Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
| Quote: | On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan@neubauten.org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81@news02.roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:pan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873@ae86.GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.
YHBT!
Yeah, I guess.
But you need a spell checker.
"Poast" is intentional.
Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your
ass!
That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)
Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.
You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook,
line and sinker!
One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap
to be sprung.
You sprung it one or two posts too soon.
Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull
out early.
*blinks*
*ahem*
Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!
But an excellent job nonetheless!
You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling
is not lost!)
Oh, it's alive and *very* well.
Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.
I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!'
LOL!
If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!
Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.
Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.
|
And did you spot yourself out in the first?
You're just an idiot.
--
Have your Virtual Pet spayed/neutered!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aratzio
Guest
|
| Posted:
Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:32 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
| Quote: | On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan@neubauten.org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81@news02.roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:pan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873@ae86.GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.
YHBT!
Yeah, I guess.
But you need a spell checker.
"Poast" is intentional.
Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your
ass!
That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)
Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.
You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook,
line and sinker!
One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap
to be sprung.
You sprung it one or two posts too soon.
Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull
out early.
*blinks*
*ahem*
Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!
But an excellent job nonetheless!
You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling
is not lost!)
Oh, it's alive and *very* well.
Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.
I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!'
LOL!
If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!
Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.
Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.
And did you spot yourself out in the first?
|
Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle
when you stood up?
| Quote: |
You're just an idiot.
|
"you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!"
PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles?
--
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005
Hammer of Thor - July, 2005
David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae.fc2.dformosa@dformosa.zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."
http://www.tweaknet.info/aratzio.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dennis M. Hammes
Guest
|
| Posted:
Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:34 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
rocky wrote:
| Quote: | On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:50:02 -0600, "Dennis M. Hammes"
scrawlmark@arvig.net> wrote:
rocky wrote:
On 27 Nov 2005 21:31:47 -0800, "Hachiroku" <pimp.timid@gmail.com
wrote:
I can get my finger in to the second knuckle and hit the 'sweet spot'
but then my wrist always seems to cramp up. I'm fully lubed and it
feels good but I can't seem to do it long enough to milk my own
prostate to orgasm. Any pointers?
a handgrinade. don't forget to pull the pin out first.
"...handgrinaid"? Vaseline?
yeah, or a claymore.
|
That's "more clay," though he might want to try a pair of bazookas.
--
-------(m+
~/:o)_|
If a pome falls in the middle of a library and
the Bishop can't read it, does it still say, "Iamb"?
http://scrawlmark.org
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dennis M. Hammes
Guest
|
| Posted:
Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:26 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
| Quote: | In News 98e4p1t1tbqsise7qb90ht3k9n2u1opqik@4ax.com,, rocky at
rocky@fuckoffspammer.meow.org, typed this:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:50:02 -0600, "Dennis M. Hammes"
scrawlmark@arvig.net> wrote:
rocky wrote:
On 27 Nov 2005 21:31:47 -0800, "Hachiroku" <pimp.timid@gmail.com
wrote:
I can get my finger in to the second knuckle and hit the 'sweet
spot' but then my wrist always seems to cramp up. I'm fully lubed
and it feels good but I can't seem to do it long enough to milk
my own prostate to orgasm. Any pointers?
a handgrinade. don't forget to pull the pin out first.
"...handgrinaid"? Vaseline?
yeah, or a claymore.
Claymoore, if you're talking about the Scotish Sword.
|
Clayton Moore, if you're talking about the Lone Ranger.
| Quote: |
"/Claigh mair/," "great sword," the four-to-five-foot two-hander, is |
not of Scottish origin or design. The hilts, being handmade and
often of pickup or scrap, were reasonably unique from piece to piece,
so that the one kept as being had by Wallace, e.g., is copied by
modern methods as a "Scottish" or "Wallace pattern" when a
more-correct term might be, e.g., "Tuesday."
The basket-hilted sidearm ("front" arm, in full dress) is a "hanger,"
also a generic term and type varying up to a foot in length and over
a pound in weight from piece to piece and time to time. A few of the
basket patterns are almost peculiarly Scottish (though not unique to
Scotland), being usually furnished (or refurnished) by a more-local
cutler after the blades were made elsewhere and traded over a much
larger area.
It acquired the term "claymore" long after the /claigh mair/ was
out of service, kids routinely using their granddads' largest Power
Noises to refer to whatever /they/ have left at the moment.
Thus, e.g., "slogan," org. /slagh gairm/, "battle cry."
--
-------(m+
~/:o)_|
If a pome falls in the middle of a library and
the Bishop can't read it, does it still say, "Iamb"?
http://scrawlmark.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dennis M. Hammes
Guest
|
| Posted:
Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:28 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
AJ wrote:
| Quote: | "Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL10@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message news:rwskf.9494$wf.5658@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
If ye daenna know, ye nae a real Scotsman.
And dink 'od.
No, Tommy, he dinna ask /who/ he was wearin' under the kilt. |
Ya gotta wait.
--
-------(m+
~/:o)_|
If a pome falls in the middle of a library and
the Bishop can't read it, does it still say, "Iamb"?
http://scrawlmark.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrealphus
Guest
|
| Posted:
Mon Dec 05, 2005 4:38 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
In News T9-dndDZ4PtnzQ7eRVn-iQ@onvoy.com,, Dennis M. Hammes at
scrawlmark@arvig.net, typed this:
| Quote: | Andrealphus wrote:
In News 98e4p1t1tbqsise7qb90ht3k9n2u1opqik@4ax.com,, rocky at
rocky@fuckoffspammer.meow.org, typed this:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:50:02 -0600, "Dennis M. Hammes"
scrawlmark@arvig.net> wrote:
rocky wrote:
On 27 Nov 2005 21:31:47 -0800, "Hachiroku" <pimp.timid@gmail.com
wrote:
I can get my finger in to the second knuckle and hit the 'sweet
spot' but then my wrist always seems to cramp up. I'm fully lubed
and it feels good but I can't seem to do it long enough to milk
my own prostate to orgasm. Any pointers?
a handgrinade. don't forget to pull the pin out first.
"...handgrinaid"? Vaseline?
yeah, or a claymore.
Claymoore, if you're talking about the Scotish Sword.
Clayton Moore, if you're talking about the Lone Ranger.
"/Claigh mair/," "great sword," the four-to-five-foot two-hander, is
not of Scottish origin or design. The hilts, being handmade and
often of pickup or scrap, were reasonably unique from piece to piece,
so that the one kept as being had by Wallace, e.g., is copied by
modern methods as a "Scottish" or "Wallace pattern" when a
more-correct term might be, e.g., "Tuesday."
The basket-hilted sidearm ("front" arm, in full dress) is a "hanger,"
also a generic term and type varying up to a foot in length and over
a pound in weight from piece to piece and time to time. A few of the
basket patterns are almost peculiarly Scottish (though not unique to
Scotland), being usually furnished (or refurnished) by a more-local
cutler after the blades were made elsewhere and traded over a much
larger area.
It acquired the term "claymore" long after the /claigh mair/ was
out of service, kids routinely using their granddads' largest Power
Noises to refer to whatever /they/ have left at the moment.
Thus, e.g., "slogan," org. /slagh gairm/, "battle cry."
|
Our Battle Cry was "Creag An Tuirc".
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hachiroku
Guest
|
| Posted:
Mon Dec 05, 2005 8:07 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
| Quote: | On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan@neubauten.org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81@news02.roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:pan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873@ae86.GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.
YHBT!
Yeah, I guess.
But you need a spell checker.
"Poast" is intentional.
Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your
ass!
That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)
Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.
You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook,
line and sinker!
One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap
to be sprung.
You sprung it one or two posts too soon.
Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull
out early.
*blinks*
*ahem*
Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!
But an excellent job nonetheless!
You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling
is not lost!)
Oh, it's alive and *very* well.
Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.
I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!'
LOL!
If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!
Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.
Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.
And did you spot yourself out in the first?
Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle
when you stood up?
|
And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite
amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again.
| Quote: |
You're just an idiot.
"you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!"
|
Yeah...and?
| Quote: |
PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles?
|
Yeah...and?
--
Have your Virtual Pet spayed/neutered!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aratzio
Guest
|
| Posted:
Mon Dec 05, 2005 8:35 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
| Quote: | On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan@neubauten.org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81@news02.roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:pan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873@ae86.GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.
YHBT!
Yeah, I guess.
But you need a spell checker.
"Poast" is intentional.
Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your
ass!
That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)
Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.
You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook,
line and sinker!
One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap
to be sprung.
You sprung it one or two posts too soon.
Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull
out early.
*blinks*
*ahem*
Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!
But an excellent job nonetheless!
You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling
is not lost!)
Oh, it's alive and *very* well.
Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.
I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!'
LOL!
If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!
Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.
Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.
And did you spot yourself out in the first?
Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle
when you stood up?
And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite
amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again.
|
*snorkle*
As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back
when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out
as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking
and cries of *victolly*.
*snorkle*
| Quote: |
You're just an idiot.
"you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!"
Yeah...and?
|
Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are.
| Quote: |
PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles?
Yeah...and?
|
Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those scathing
retorts. Now go with your standard "not worthy" response.
--
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005
Hammer of Thor - July, 2005
David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae.fc2.dformosa@dformosa.zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."
http://www.tweaknet.info/aratzio.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hachiroku
Guest
|
| Posted:
Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:19 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:35:43 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
| Quote: | On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan@neubauten.org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81@news02.roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:pan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873@ae86.GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.
YHBT!
Yeah, I guess.
But you need a spell checker.
"Poast" is intentional.
Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your
ass!
That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)
Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.
You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook,
line and sinker!
One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap
to be sprung.
You sprung it one or two posts too soon.
Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull
out early.
*blinks*
*ahem*
Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!
But an excellent job nonetheless!
You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling
is not lost!)
Oh, it's alive and *very* well.
Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.
I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!'
LOL!
If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!
Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.
Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.
And did you spot yourself out in the first?
Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle
when you stood up?
And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite
amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again.
*snorkle*
As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back
when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out
as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking
and cries of *victolly*.
*snorkle*
You're just an idiot.
"you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!"
Yeah...and?
Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are.
|
Maybe you'll convince yourself of that someday. Who have you spanked?
| Quote: |
PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles?
Yeah...and?
Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those scathing
retorts.
|
In your case, about a nanosecond.
| Quote: | Now go with your standard "not worthy" response.
|
You seem to understand that already. I hate to keep stating the obvious.
See, I know how to use my newsreader. I can unplonk you at will, then when
I tire of your assinine rantings, plonk you again. Not such a hard
concept to grasp, really. Why does it seem to bother you so?
--
Have your Virtual Pet spayed/neutered!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aratzio
Guest
|
| Posted:
Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:55 pm Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:24:50 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS>
transparently proposed:
| Quote: | On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:35:43 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan@neubauten.org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81@news02.roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:pan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873@ae86.GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.
YHBT!
Yeah, I guess.
But you need a spell checker.
"Poast" is intentional.
Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your
ass!
That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)
Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.
You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook,
line and sinker!
One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap
to be sprung.
You sprung it one or two posts too soon.
Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull
out early.
*blinks*
*ahem*
Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!
But an excellent job nonetheless!
You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling
is not lost!)
Oh, it's alive and *very* well.
Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.
I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!'
LOL!
If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!
Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.
Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.
And did you spot yourself out in the first?
Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle
when you stood up?
And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite
amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again.
*snorkle*
As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back
when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out
as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking
and cries of *victolly*.
*snorkle*
You're just an idiot.
"you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!"
Yeah...and?
Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are.
Maybe you'll convince yourself of that someday. Who have you spanked?
|
Well, lets see, how about when I predicted you would start froup
snecking and declare *victolly* and within 30 minutes you did. How
about when you claimed you were not reading my posts and kept
responding by proxy whining you were not reading my posts. That is
just two. Would you like more my little spanktoi?
| Quote: |
PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles?
Yeah...and?
Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those scathing
retorts.
In your case, about a nanosecond.
|
Had it written down in your book of lamery.
| Quote: |
Now go with your standard "not worthy" response.
You seem to understand that already. I hate to keep stating the obvious.
|
*snorkle*
Was being a predictable and lame wanker a lifelong dream of yours?
| Quote: |
See, I know how to use my newsreader. I can unplonk you at will, then when
I tire of your assinine rantings, plonk you again. Not such a hard
concept to grasp, really. Why does it seem to bother you so?
|
Except anyone with a clue and is not a total moron understands just
what *plonk* means. To you it means *i'm scared and you make me look
bad so I will hide you from me*. To the nonspanktoi usenet it is
"Jebus Fuck, you are lame, go away" and there you stay. No *unplonk*
when you realize it did not work and you cannot keep yourself from
responding.
--
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005
Hammer of Thor - July, 2005
David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae.fc2.dformosa@dformosa.zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."
http://www.tweaknet.info/aratzio.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
meowmix
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Dec 06, 2005 2:03 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 02:14:47 GMT, Dionisio
<moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Andrealphus wrote:
Claymoore, if you're talking about the Scotish Sword.
Insert obligatory question of "What do Scotsmen wear under their
kilts?" here
|
gin-ger pubes.
--
meowmix
mhm x v i x i i i
alcotrol labs r&d
dathbrawl nominee.
please make sure to vote for me.
NUKE FRANCE
meow |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
meowmix
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Dec 06, 2005 2:04 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 22:38:52 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL10@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
| Quote: | In News T9-dndDZ4PtnzQ7eRVn-iQ@onvoy.com,, Dennis M. Hammes at
scrawlmark@arvig.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 98e4p1t1tbqsise7qb90ht3k9n2u1opqik@4ax.com,, rocky at
rocky@fuckoffspammer.meow.org, typed this:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:50:02 -0600, "Dennis M. Hammes"
scrawlmark@arvig.net> wrote:
rocky wrote:
On 27 Nov 2005 21:31:47 -0800, "Hachiroku" <pimp.timid@gmail.com
wrote:
I can get my finger in to the second knuckle and hit the 'sweet
spot' but then my wrist always seems to cramp up. I'm fully lubed
and it feels good but I can't seem to do it long enough to milk
my own prostate to orgasm. Any pointers?
a handgrinade. don't forget to pull the pin out first.
"...handgrinaid"? Vaseline?
yeah, or a claymore.
Claymoore, if you're talking about the Scotish Sword.
Clayton Moore, if you're talking about the Lone Ranger.
"/Claigh mair/," "great sword," the four-to-five-foot two-hander, is
not of Scottish origin or design. The hilts, being handmade and
often of pickup or scrap, were reasonably unique from piece to piece,
so that the one kept as being had by Wallace, e.g., is copied by
modern methods as a "Scottish" or "Wallace pattern" when a
more-correct term might be, e.g., "Tuesday."
The basket-hilted sidearm ("front" arm, in full dress) is a "hanger,"
also a generic term and type varying up to a foot in length and over
a pound in weight from piece to piece and time to time. A few of the
basket patterns are almost peculiarly Scottish (though not unique to
Scotland), being usually furnished (or refurnished) by a more-local
cutler after the blades were made elsewhere and traded over a much
larger area.
It acquired the term "claymore" long after the /claigh mair/ was
out of service, kids routinely using their granddads' largest Power
Noises to refer to whatever /they/ have left at the moment.
Thus, e.g., "slogan," org. /slagh gairm/, "battle cry."
Our Battle Cry was "Creag An Tuirc".
|
last one to the bar pays for the whiskey?
--
meowmix
mhm x v i x i i i
alcotrol labs r&d
dathbrawl nominee.
please make sure to vote for me.
NUKE FRANCE
meow |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrealphus
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Dec 06, 2005 4:39 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
In News h979p15kchpgpavjusolgerko1g21rngbj@4ax.com,, meowmix at
meow.mix@fuckoffspammer.meow.org, typed this:
| Quote: | On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 22:38:52 GMT, "Andrealphus"
NOREALEMAIL10@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
In News T9-dndDZ4PtnzQ7eRVn-iQ@onvoy.com,, Dennis M. Hammes at
scrawlmark@arvig.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 98e4p1t1tbqsise7qb90ht3k9n2u1opqik@4ax.com,, rocky at
rocky@fuckoffspammer.meow.org, typed this:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:50:02 -0600, "Dennis M. Hammes"
scrawlmark@arvig.net> wrote:
rocky wrote:
On 27 Nov 2005 21:31:47 -0800, "Hachiroku"
pimp.timid@gmail.com> wrote:
I can get my finger in to the second knuckle and hit the 'sweet
spot' but then my wrist always seems to cramp up. I'm fully
lubed and it feels good but I can't seem to do it long enough
to milk my own prostate to orgasm. Any pointers?
a handgrinade. don't forget to pull the pin out first.
"...handgrinaid"? Vaseline?
yeah, or a claymore.
Claymoore, if you're talking about the Scotish Sword.
Clayton Moore, if you're talking about the Lone Ranger.
"/Claigh mair/," "great sword," the four-to-five-foot two-hander, is
not of Scottish origin or design. The hilts, being handmade and
often of pickup or scrap, were reasonably unique from piece to
piece, so that the one kept as being had by Wallace, e.g., is
copied by modern methods as a "Scottish" or "Wallace pattern" when a
more-correct term might be, e.g., "Tuesday."
The basket-hilted sidearm ("front" arm, in full dress) is a
"hanger," also a generic term and type varying up to a foot in
length and over a pound in weight from piece to piece and time to
time. A few of the basket patterns are almost peculiarly Scottish
(though not unique to Scotland), being usually furnished (or
refurnished) by a more-local cutler after the blades were made
elsewhere and traded over a much larger area.
It acquired the term "claymore" long after the /claigh mair/ was
out of service, kids routinely using their granddads' largest Power
Noises to refer to whatever /they/ have left at the moment.
Thus, e.g., "slogan," org. /slagh gairm/, "battle cry."
Our Battle Cry was "Creag An Tuirc".
last one to the bar pays for the whiskey?
|
Not quite, but I think it was close. LOL!
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Glennaebad
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Dec 07, 2005 12:18 am Post subject:
Re: Please remove scs from the headers |
|
|
"Russell B" <bigfunchy@databasix.com> wrote in message
news:dn423b$odo$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
| Quote: | What makes "Adam Whyte-Settlar" so straight, and me so bent?
He's straight all right but he's an arrogant Twat. |
Glen |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hachiroku
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Dec 07, 2005 6:55 am Post subject:
Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:55:48 +0000, Aratzio wrote:
| Quote: | On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:24:50 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS
transparently proposed:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:35:43 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> got
double secret probation because:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan@neubauten.org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81@news02.roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> posted
something accessible as news:pan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873@ae86.GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.
YHBT!
Yeah, I guess.
But you need a spell checker.
"Poast" is intentional.
Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your
ass!
That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)
Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.
You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook,
line and sinker!
One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap
to be sprung.
You sprung it one or two posts too soon.
Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull
out early.
*blinks*
*ahem*
Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!
But an excellent job nonetheless!
You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling
is not lost!)
Oh, it's alive and *very* well.
Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.
I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!'
LOL!
If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!
Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.
Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.
And did you spot yourself out in the first?
Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle
when you stood up?
And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite
amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again.
*snorkle*
As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back
when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out
as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking
and cries of *victolly*.
*snorkle*
You're just an idiot.
"you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!"
Yeah...and?
Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are.
Maybe you'll convince yourself of that someday. Who have you spanked?
Well, lets see, how about when I predicted you would start froup
snecking and declare *victolly* and within 30 minutes you did. How
about when you claimed you were not reading my posts and kept
responding by proxy whining you were not reading my posts. That is
just two. Would you like more my little spanktoi?
|
Why should I weant to respond to a bunch of groups I don't suscribe to?
That one makes no sense at all. You wanna play in the Toyota group, play
there. I don't really need your 'audience' to serve up what a fool you are.
And you're wrong. I declared *victolly* in about 15 minutes. It's really
not all that hard to best you...you just keep on with the ssame old crap
over and over, just like you are now. Nothing new here...
I wasn't reading your posts, I was reading other's responses to you weak
arguements. Little bit of a difference there, Sunshine.
"You plonked me!!! You plonked me!!" Yeah, so what?
And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would.
I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake".
Nothing new, just the same old crap.
Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record.
| Quote: |
PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles?
Yeah...and?
Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those scathing
retorts.
In your case, about a nanosecond.
Had it written down in your book of lamery.
Now go with your standard "not worthy" response.
You seem to understand that already. I hate to keep stating the obvious.
*snorkle*
Was being a predictable and lame wanker a lifelong dream of yours?
See, I know how to use my newsreader. I can unplonk you at will, then when
I tire of your assinine rantings, plonk you again. Not such a hard
concept to grasp, really. Why does it seem to bother you so?
Except anyone with a clue and is not a total moron understands just
what *plonk* means. To you it means *i'm scared and you make me look
bad so I will hide you from me*. To the nonspanktoi usenet it is
"Jebus Fuck, you are lame, go away" and there you stay. No *unplonk*
when you realize it did not work and you cannot keep yourself from
responding.
|
--
Have your Virtual Pet spayed/neutered!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in