| Author |
Message |
Codifus
Guest
|
 Posted:
Tue Oct 04, 2005 7:05 pm Post subject:
Using regular gas in a car designed for super |
|
|
I was wodnering why this thread always comes back to newsgroups and I
think I see it:
Using reagular gas in your car designed for premium is like smoking
cigarettes. Why? becuase both will do damage but the effects won't show
up until a considerable amount of time has passed. With smoking
cigarettes, it may take a decade or so for the lungs to really start to
suffere, and by using regular gas, your car will suffere the ill effects
some time down the road, never immediately.
Just my 2 cents
CD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve T
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:15 am Post subject:
Re: Using regular gas in a car designed for super |
|
|
Codifus wrote:
| Quote: | I was wodnering why this thread always comes back to newsgroups and I
think I see it:
Using reagular gas in your car designed for premium is like smoking
cigarettes. Why? becuase both will do damage but the effects won't show
up until a considerable amount of time has passed. With smoking
cigarettes, it may take a decade or so for the lungs to really start to
suffere, and by using regular gas, your car will suffere the ill effects
some time down the road, never immediately.
|
Exactly, people claim they have "no problems" yet have only been doing this
to their cars for a couple of years. These same people will be the "This
car is a POS" when the engine is burning oil at 120K and of course it can't
be because they used cheap gas in it.
--
Steve
http://www.atlantaracing.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SPAT
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:37 am Post subject:
Re: Using regular gas in a car designed for super |
|
|
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 01:22:04 -0400, Steve T <fotocord@yahoo.com>
wrote:
| Quote: | Codifus wrote:
I was wodnering why this thread always comes back to newsgroups and I
think I see it:
Using reagular gas in your car designed for premium is like smoking
cigarettes. Why? becuase both will do damage but the effects won't show
up until a considerable amount of time has passed. With smoking
cigarettes, it may take a decade or so for the lungs to really start to
suffere, and by using regular gas, your car will suffere the ill effects
some time down the road, never immediately.
Exactly, people claim they have "no problems" yet have only been doing this
to their cars for a couple of years. These same people will be the "This
car is a POS" when the engine is burning oil at 120K and of course it can't
be because they used cheap gas in it.
|
YES!
AT LAST!
SOMEONE WITH COMMON SENCE!
WAAHOOOO!!!!!!!!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RDN
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:41 am Post subject:
Re: Using regular gas in a car designed for super |
|
|
I drive a 97 Max SE with just over 120K miles.
With oil changes every 4000 miles and tuneups every 65K
New battery every 5-6 years.
And 98.9% of the time I used 92-93 octane.
I believe can do another 120K on her.
"SPAT" <jm1234@sc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:pk5mk1d6shtijn558clbpt57i7ld0mtmcg@4ax.com...
| Quote: | On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 01:22:04 -0400, Steve T <fotocord@yahoo.com
wrote:
Codifus wrote:
I was wodnering why this thread always comes back to newsgroups and I
think I see it:
Using reagular gas in your car designed for premium is like smoking
cigarettes. Why? becuase both will do damage but the effects won't show
up until a considerable amount of time has passed. With smoking
cigarettes, it may take a decade or so for the lungs to really start to
suffere, and by using regular gas, your car will suffere the ill
effects
some time down the road, never immediately.
Exactly, people claim they have "no problems" yet have only been doing
this
to their cars for a couple of years. These same people will be the "This
car is a POS" when the engine is burning oil at 120K and of course it
can't
be because they used cheap gas in it.
YES!
AT LAST!
SOMEONE WITH COMMON SENCE!
WAAHOOOO!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in