| Author |
Message |
AdamG
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:14 am Post subject:
Re: porsche |
|
|
Sorry guys that website must be having server problems, there is a lot of
other cars on there without their pictures showing too.. some are, some not.
Ive put some here so maybe try here instead..
http://community.webshots.com/album/423196320dUTQYd
The bumpers are similar but i dont think they stick out as far as the US
ones, and the rubber strip is thinner and goes all the way across.
Adam.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patty Winter
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:13 am Post subject:
Re: porsche |
|
|
| Quote: | The bumpers are similar but i dont think they stick out as far as the US
ones, and the rubber strip is thinner and goes all the way across.
|
Yeah, you're right. I didn't realize there were regional variations.
Those cabriolets sure are pretty. :-)
BTW, my 1986 951, Pfeffer, just turned 100K a few weeks ago.
Patty |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AdamG
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:29 pm Post subject:
Re: porsche |
|
|
Thanks, It looks even prettier when its going. Its been sitting in the
garage the last couple of weeks waiting on a clutch. So can't wait to get
behind the wheel again.
My S2 cab has i think 152,000 (95k miles) kilometers on it now. I heard the
rubber centered clutch was good for around 150k ..seems accurate! :) I would
like to get a 951 as well as the cab but somehow im not sure how i'll get
that past my other half.
Adam.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Devils944S2
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Aug 20, 2005 8:13 am Post subject:
Re: porsche |
|
|
<"it only counts if it was made in Zuffenhausen" >
ALL of the engines were made in Zuffenhausen, the "not a real Porsche"
thing comes from cars not assembled in Stuttgart.
Thing is, this argument is relatively new. It used to be "If it is
water-cooled it is not a "real" Porsche. And, we all know what happened to
that argument. So onto plan II, the manufacturing sight. It just is
ridiculous. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Keenan
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Aug 20, 2005 4:13 pm Post subject:
Re: porsche |
|
|
| Quote: | "it only counts if it was made in Zuffenhausen"
ALL of the engines were made in Zuffenhausen, the "not a real Porsche"
thing comes from cars not assembled in Stuttgart.
Thing is, this argument is relatively new. It used to be "If it is
water-cooled it is not a "real" Porsche. And, we all know what happened to
that argument. So onto plan II, the manufacturing sight. It just is
ridiculous.
|
Absolutely. The ultimate irony may well be the Carrera GT, which is built at
Leipzig. Anybody think it's not a "real" Porsche? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fbloogyudsr
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Aug 20, 2005 4:13 pm Post subject:
Re: porsche |
|
|
"Jim Keenan" <jimkeenan@cox.net> wrote
| Quote: | "Devils944S2" <devils944@nospam.net> wrote
"it only counts if it was made in Zuffenhausen"
ALL of the engines were made in Zuffenhausen, the "not a real Porsche"
thing comes from cars not assembled in Stuttgart.
Thing is, this argument is relatively new. It used to be "If it is
water-cooled it is not a "real" Porsche. And, we all know what happened
to that argument. So onto plan II, the manufacturing sight. It just is
ridiculous.
Absolutely. The ultimate irony may well be the Carrera GT, which is built
at Leipzig. Anybody think it's not a "real" Porsche?
|
How can a mid-engine car be a "real" Porsche. Gotta be rear-engined.
;->
FloydR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Keenan
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Aug 20, 2005 4:13 pm Post subject:
Re: porsche |
|
|
| My 996 agrees with you............... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Keenan
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 18, 2005 6:47 pm Post subject:
Re: porsche |
|
|
| Quote: | i have a question to you die hard porsche enthusiasts...
do you consider the porsche 911 to be the only 'true' porsche?
all the other models are not truly porsches?
|
No. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fred Klingener
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 18, 2005 8:46 pm Post subject:
Re: porsche |
|
|
It's confusing, I know.
When the 356B came out, owners of the A sniffed that it hadn't been touched
by the Master, and it wasn't a 'true' Porsche. Ever since, the only 'true'
Porsche has been the one that you own. Sometimes you're allowed to include
years older than yours, but usually not those with different engine cooling
media.
Hope this helps,
Fred Klingener
'73 911T (The last true Porsche) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 18, 2005 9:27 pm Post subject:
Re: porsche |
|
|
Come on now, do your homework, first "Porsche" had the mid-engine,,,,,,,rear
engine came next after assessing manufacturing costs and such......
Joe |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
E Brown
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Nov 19, 2005 9:15 am Post subject:
Re: porsche |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:50:25 -0800, "Bernard Farquart"
<bernardfarquart@delete.hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | No, you guys are all driving volkswagons and audis.
I have the only "clean sheet" Porsche, the 928 not
based on any other car, but truly and only
Porsche.
|
Um, the Boxster? :)
epbrown
--
2003 BMW 325i Black/Black
2003 BMW Z4 Black/Black |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bernard Farquart
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Nov 19, 2005 9:15 am Post subject:
Re: porsche |
|
|
"Fred Klingener" <gigabitbucket@brockeng.com> wrote in message
news:JOlff.496
| Quote: | No.
It's confusing, I know.
When the 356B came out, owners of the A sniffed that it hadn't been
touched
by the Master, and it wasn't a 'true' Porsche. Ever since, the only
'true'
Porsche has been the one that you own. Sometimes you're allowed to
include
years older than yours, but usually not those with different engine
cooling
media.
Hope this helps,
Fred Klingener
'73 911T (The last true Porsche)
|
No, you guys are all driving volkswagons and audis.
I have the only "clean sheet" Porsche, the 928 not
based on any other car, but truly and only
Porsche.
Bernard |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bernard Farquart
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Nov 20, 2005 11:08 pm Post subject:
Re: porsche |
|
|
Ooops, I meant to say "first" I had heard "only" for
so many years, I forgot they went and did it again.
Bernard |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted:
Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:16 am Post subject:
Re: porsche |
|
|
Bernard,
This is usenet. Never admit you were wrong. Just create three new
aliases to agree with your misstep.
(Can't believe I need to say this!)
The Cayanne is another pure Porsche.
(Damn. That's a VW! Now look at the typing I've got to do!)
Bernard Farquart wrote:
| Quote: |
Ooops, I meant to say "first" I had heard "only" for
so many years, I forgot they went and did it again.
Bernard
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
carbuzzard.com
Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 5
|
Posted:
Fri Dec 02, 2005 12:25 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Why has no one mentioned the 914?  _________________ Philbert J Thrombockle
http://www.carbuzzard.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|