| Author |
Message |
#om
Guest
|
Posted:
Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:05 am Post subject:
Windstar yet again |
|
|
Hey group. Have read hundreds of Windstar-related posts. Some
obvious trends show up. What I'm wondering is if there's a year model
at which one could say the two biggies-head gasket and tranny, were
finally corrected.
I'm still driving my '88 Bronco II and hope to do so for another year
or so but will probably opt for a mini van after that. So you can
see, this is a very slow process.
Aesthetically, I just prefer the Windstar to any other make. BTW, are
there or are there not different body sizes/styles in this line. Some
just look smaller to me( a good thing) than others.
Finally, I see many Winstars being used as company vehicles. Would it
be wise to try to work a deal on something like this or will these
just be more beat up? I tend to use my vehicles about 60/40 audio
equip. hauling to family use. thnx +oM
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Dec 07, 2004 4:09 am Post subject:
Re: Windstar yet again |
|
|
Well, I guess Ill just have to reply to myself then. Y'all sick of
talking about these things then? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lawrence Glickman
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Dec 07, 2004 4:25 am Post subject:
Re: Windstar yet again |
|
|
On 6 Dec 2004 15:09:41 -0800, cduffey@new.rr.com wrote:
| Quote: | Well, I guess Ill just have to reply to myself then. Y'all sick of
talking about these things then?
|
I didn't see your original post. sorry.
Lg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Dec 07, 2004 5:40 am Post subject:
Re: Windstar yet again |
|
|
| It's called "Windstar Yet Again", Lawrence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lawrence Glickman
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Dec 07, 2004 5:40 am Post subject:
Re: Windstar yet again |
|
|
On 6 Dec 2004 16:41:13 -0800, cduffey@new.rr.com wrote:
| Quote: | It's called "Windstar Yet Again", Lawrence.
|
OK, I'll go to google archives. sorry, it has been a _busy_
day/evening.
I'm going to google right now.
Lg |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lawrence Glickman
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Dec 07, 2004 5:40 am Post subject:
Re: Windstar yet again |
|
|
On 6 Dec 2004 16:41:13 -0800, cduffey@new.rr.com wrote:
| Quote: | It's called "Windstar Yet Again", Lawrence.
|
OK, I'll go to google archives. sorry, it has been a _busy_
day/evening.
I'm going to google right now.
Lg
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
OP:
=================================================
Hey group. Have read hundreds of Windstar-related posts. Some
obvious trends show up. What I'm wondering is if there's a year model
at which one could say the two biggies-head gasket and tranny, were
finally corrected.
I'm still driving my '88 Bronco II and hope to do so for another year
or so but will probably opt for a mini van after that. So you can
see, this is a very slow process.
Aesthetically, I just prefer the Windstar to any other make. BTW, are
there or are there not different body sizes/styles in this line. Some
just look smaller to me( a good thing) than others.
Finally, I see many Winstars being used as company vehicles. Would it
be wise to try to work a deal on something like this or will these
just be more beat up? I tend to use my vehicles about 60/40 audio
equip. hauling to family use. thnx +oM
=======================================================
I would say, go to JJ Powers or such for a report on Windstar and see
what they think about it. I will take a look myself:
looks like:
News For 2004, Ford's minivan was replaced by a new model called
Freestar.
anyhow, click on this URL and get all the info you could want, aside
from what was in the n/g's
http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/new/reviews/full/index.cfm/id/23220.htm
Lg |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|